As of December 2010, the following organizations and individuals had expressed their support for WikiLeaks, Julian Assange (its founder), and/or Bradley Manning (the former U.S. Army soldier who furnished WikiLeaks with many of its classified documents):
ORGANIZATIONS:
Avaaz:
On December 8, 2010, this organization,
which promotes left-wing
political agendas through web-based movement-building and
public-opinion campaigns,
launched
a petition in
support of WikiLeaks; it was signed by more than 250,000 people
within the first few hours.
The
Atlanticmagazine: Following the November 2010 leak of more than 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables, The
Atlantic, in a staff editorial, opined:
"Wikileaks is a powerful new way for reporters and human rights
advocates to leverage global information technology systems to break
the heavy veil of government and corporate secrecy that is slowly
suffocating the American press." Calling legal and physical
threats against WikiLeaks volunteers "shameful," the
magazine added:
"Not since President Richard Nixon directed his minions to go
after Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg and New
York Times
reporter Neil Sheehan ... has a working journalist and his source
been subjected to the kind of official intimidation and threats that
have been directed at Assange and Manning by high-ranking members of
the Obama Administration."
Code
Pink: This organization's founder,
Medea
Benjamin, is a
member of the Bradley Manning Support Network Advisory
Board.
Courage
to Resist: This group developed a legal-defense fund to assist with Bradley
Manning’s court expenses.
The Greater New Haven Peace Council: This front for the Communist Party USA has campaigned in support of Bradley Manning.
The
International Socialist Organization's Boston chapter said
in December 2010: “In
many ways, WikiLeaks [has] confirmed with damning evidence what many
people around the world already knew: that the U.S. is the biggest
bully in the world and uses all kinds of violence and power to remain
the world’s only superpower. While the Obama Administration and
other governments of the world claim that WikiLeaks is criminal for
'endangering lives of Americans' and 'undermining democracy and
diplomacy,' it is the U.S.’ actions that are outrageous—not the
efforts of brave whistleblowers to expose them.”
Iraq
Veterans Against the War (IVAW): This organization's
executive director, José Vasquez, is a member
of the Bradley Manning Support Network’s Advisory Board.
The
Movement
for a Democratic Society – which seeks "to effect
change at the most basic levels of economic, political, and social
organization" by means of "a radical, democratic
program counter-posed to authoritarian movements" – supports Bradley Manning.
The
National
Lawyers Guild's Military Law Task Force – a network of
attorneys, law students, and legal workers concerned with the rights
of service members and veterans – supports
Assange and Manning. On August 12, 2010, the Guild's Oklahoma chapter
supported a pro-Manning rally organized
by
the Oklahoma Center for Conscience.
The
Oklahoma
Center for Conscience
– which promotes “a belief in the power of conscience as the way
to end war and warmaking” – supports
Bradley Manning.
QueerToday,
a network of “queer social justice activists,” supports
Bradley Manning.
The
Peace and Freedom Partysaid in 2010:
“Wikileaks
is currently under heavy attack. Therefore the Peace and Freedom
Party is joining many other organizations that are using their
websites to help insure that these documents are continuously
available.”
The
San
Diego Military Counseling Project
– which helps service members “apply for discharges based on
conscientious objection, hardship and dependency” – supports
Bradley Manning.
The
San
Francisco Labor Council, whichis
the local body of the AFL-CIO, formally
opposes the prosecution of Bradley Manning. In 2010 the organization sent
letters to President Obama, California Congressional
representatives, and California Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, calling for the
charges to be dropped and for Manning to be released.
The
Social Alliance's national
convener, Peter Boyle, said in late 2010:
“The
Australian government should defend and support Wikileaks and its
founder Julian Assange, and their efforts to expose the lies,
duplicities and outright crimes of the U.S. government and its allies.
We condemn the Australian government for collaborating with the
American government in hunting Julian Assange down. The exposure of
classified U.S. government cables and other material by Wikileaks is an
enormous plus for all those who are fighting for truth and democracy
and against war and exploitation. Wikileaks and Assange deserve our
strongest support.”
The Socialist Party USAsaid in late 2010:
“The
Wikileaks documents that were bravely secured by Bradley Manning and
published by Julian Assange reveal a U.S. military operation in
Afghanistan that has violated nearly every tenet of international
human rights.... These documents prove
decisively that the truth is indeed the first casualty of war.... Now
is the time to summon the courage of Bradley Manning and Julian
Assange. To protect them against the repression of the US
government.”
SocialistWorker.orgsaid in 2010: “The irony about the push by U.S. officials to
close down WikiLeaks, of course, is that the U.S. establishment is
highly critical of governments like Iran's and China's when they
attempt to censor the Internet.... But when it's the U.S. attempting
to do the censoring and keep official secrets away from the public,
suddenly a little 'authoritarianism' doesn't seem so bad.... [T]he
international manhunt for Assange and the American media's
guilty-until-proven-innocent attitude is in stark contrast to the
lack of outrage about the governments and military officials that
WikiLeaks has again proved are guilty of enabling murder, massacres
and torture.... Focusing on Julian Assange and the supposed 'threat'
he poses is far easier for politicians and the media than dealing
with the disclosures of U.S. complicity in massacres and
torture.”
The
Tom
Hayden Peace and Justice Resource Center – which calls for “the
U.S. to exit the wars in the Middle East” – supports
Bradley Manning.
Veterans
For Peace (VFP): In July 2010, VFP president Mike Ferner wrote:
"Neither Wikileaks nor the soldier or soldiers who divulged the
documents should be prosecuted for revealing this information. We
should give them a medal."
The
War
Resisters League (WRL)
believes
that “Bradley Manning should be free because speaking the truth
about war is not a crime.” Adds
WRL: “We honor Bradley for his courageous act of resistance to the
U.S. occupation of West and South Asia.”
The
Washington
Peace Center
– a leftist organization working for “peace, justice, and
non-violent social change in the metropolitan Washington D.C. area
since 1963” – is “proud
to support Bradley Manning and [to] demand [that] he be immediately
released from custody and that all charges against him be
dropped.”
The
World Socialist website demanded, in late 2010,
“an immediate halt to the campaign against WikiLeaks and Julian
Assange,” asserting that “all the documents WikiLeaks has in its
possession should be released for the world to see.”
INDIVIDUALS:
Medea
Benjamin (founder of Code
Pink): A member of the Bradley Manning Support Network Advisory
Board, Ms. Benjamin said in 2010:
“Democracy needs whistleblowers, and peace activists need Bradley
Manning. We must honor his courage by turning these leaks into a
tsunami of support for him and pressure on our elected officials to
end the wars.”
Peter
Boyle, national convener of the Socialist Alliance, said in 2010:
“The
Australian government should defend and support Wikileaks and its
founder Julian Assange, and their efforts to expose the lies,
duplicities and outright crimes of the U.S. government and its allies.
We condemn the Australian government for collaborating with the
American government in hunting Julian Assange down. The exposure of
classified U.S. government cables and other material by Wikileaks is an
enormous plus for all those who are fighting for truth and democracy
and against war and exploitation. Wikileaks and Assange deserve our
strongest support.”
Noam
Chomsky: The longtime linguistics professor and leftist icon
lauded
Bradley Manning as a man of "courage" and "integrity."
Said
Chomsky: “It
is a privilege to join the campaign to support Bradley Manning for
his courage and integrity in serving his country by helping make the
government accountable to its citizens, and to inform the world of
what its people should know.”
Marsha
Coleman-Adebayo: A member of the Bradley Manning Support Network’s
Advisory Board, Coleman-Adebayo is a founder and leader of the No
FEAR Coalition and EPA Employees Against Racial Discrimination. She said in late 2010: “To single out this young man [Manning],
who unlike his superiors has the moral conviction and the requisite
courage to call a war crime a war crime—is reprehensible. We have an immediate past-President, Vice President, Secretaries
of Defense and State, Directors of Central Intelligence and many
other high-ranking U.S. officials who were instrumental in the lies
that led to the wars the United States started under the Bush
administration. Yet not one of those senior officials has been held
accountable.”
Daniel
Ellsberg: The man who released the Pentagon
Papers in 1971, Ellsberg has
defended WikiLeaks on a number of occasions. Following WikiLeaks'
November 28, 2010 release of some 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables,
Ellsberg rejected criticism that the website was endangering the
lives of U.S. military personnel and intelligence assets. “Not one
single soldier or informant has been in danger from any of the
WikiLeaks releases,” he said.
“That risk has been largely overblown.” A
member of the Bradley Manning Support Network’s Advisory Board,
Ellsberg also said in 2010:
“From what I’ve heard of Manning, he is a new hero of
mine.”
Mike Gravel: Former U.S. Senator Mike
Gravel
(D-Alaska, 1969-1981) was instrumental in bringing the Pentagon
Papers to public attention in 1971. In 2010 he said:
“Bradley Manning has displayed intellect and courage far beyond his
years. He has demonstrated a sensitivity to the needs of our
Democracy: informing the American public of the actual goings-on
within the military at war. How else will voters influence their
representatives? His conduct properly embarrasses our political and
military leadership from the president on down. Any punishment for
his actions underscores that embarrassment.”
Scott Horton:
The host of Antiwar
Radio
and the keeper of The
Stress Blog,
Horton was foreign policy adviser to 2004 U.S. Libertarian Party
Presidential candidate Michael Badnarik. “Bradley Manning’s
[apparent] self-sacrifice in order to deliver to the people of
America and the world important truths about the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan is nothing short of heroic,” Horton said in 2010.
“Were the these facts dependent only on America’s ‘free press’
to receive the light of day, they would all simply suffocate in the
dark.... Please
help the Bradley Manning Support Network, Courage to Resist and their
associates in raising the money necessary to defend this brave young
man before his upcoming military court martial.”
Arianna Huffingtonsaid
of Assange in late 2010: “To
call him a terrorist is really to ... underestimate what ‘terrorist’ means. I find it so objectionable
when we throw these words around, when we call people terrorists who
have not done anything that would conventionally be seen as a
terrorist act.” When Huffington was subsequently asked whether she objected to Assange "putting
innocent lives, not to mention the lives of our soldiers, in jeopardy,” she replied:
“I think that our government is putting the lives of our soldiers
in jeopardy in Afghanistan for no clear national-security reason....
I find it so upsetting when we’re equating acts of terrorism with
the release of information
that is actually exposing a disastrous American foreign
policy.”
Connie
Mack IV (Republican congressman from Florida): Praising
WikiLeaks, Rep. Mack in 2010 agreed
with the assertion that Americans have a right to know the contents
of the leaks, “no matter how we acquire that knowledge.”
Michael
Moore: On August 20, 2010, the famed filmmaker -- a member of the Bradley Manning Support
Network’s advisory board -- told the Associated Press
that he would contribute $5,000 to Manning’s legal defense. Moore called
Manning a “courageous”
and "patriotic" individual deserving of a "Profiles in
Courage" award.
James
Oaksun,
the national chair of Outright
Libertarians –
an association of “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other
self-identified 'queer'” Libertarian Party activists and supporters
– said in 2010:
“We are involved in two hot wars, and we learned a long time ago
that ‘following orders’ is not a defense for improper actions. I am troubled by the information and the nature of the events Pfc.
Manning has revealed, and also think it’s inexcusable to attempt to
impugn Pfc. Manning personally. I am pleased to support Pfc. Manning
and urge that his case be adjudicated promptly.”
Ron
Paul (Republican Congressman of Texas ): On December 3, 2010, Ron Paul
spoke
out publicly during a Fox Business interview in support of
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. "In a free society, we're
supposed to know the truth," Paul said.
"In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big
trouble." In another speech before U.S. House of Representatives,
Paul again defended WikiLeaks and asserted that "lying is not patriotic."
John
Pilger: In an August 2010 editorial titled "WikiLeaks Must Be
Defended," this documentary filmmaker said
that WikiLeaks represented the interests of "public
accountability" and a new form of journalism that was at odds with "the
dominant section ... devoted merely to taking down what cynical and
malign power tells it." Pilger, who regards Assange as a
personal friend whom he holds in “very high regard,” also offered
to pay 20,000 pounds in sureties for Assange's court case.
Pilger added that as a result of the WikiLeaks controversies, Assange
“has made a lot of enemies, the principal one being the warmonger,
the United States.”
Justin Raimondo, editorial
director for Antiwar.com,
said:
“I can think of no more important immediate task for the antiwar
movement, and for civil libertarians in general, than freeing Bradley
Manning, and defending Wikileaks from attack. The Bradley Manning
Support Network is essential to both of these efforts, and I urge you
to give it your unqualified endorsement: contribute money, your time,
and spread the word — Free Bradley Manning!”
Wade
Rathke, former chief organizer of ACORN,
wrote
an article in defense of WikiLeaks in December 2010.
Marakay
Rogers
– a former Libertarian
Party
gubernatorial candidate in Pennsylvania and a board member of
Outright
Libertarians –
said in late 2010:
“Bradley Manning is an American hero. In this
day and age, there is no more dangerous yet vitally necessary act
than speaking the truth about our government.”
Israel Shamir, a noted anti-Semite and Holocaust denier, serves as WikiLeaks' content aggregator in Russia. In this role, Shamir is responsible for selecting and distributing secret cables to Russian news organizations.